SE Sector Evaluation Model
← Main page
Free of charge · No login required

This page aims to inform officials when to use fiscal, monetary, and legislative policy tools.

Read a sector's numbers in four layers, not one.

Sector Evaluation is a diagnostic model that turns six figures from a sector's financial statements into four linked efficiency ratios — product, operating activity, financing, and asset use — and rates each one on a seven-band scale from Loss to Excellent. Run it below and export the finished evaluation as a PDF.

06Inputs needed
04Efficiency ratios
07Rating bands
01PDF report
Exhibit 01 — Overview

What Sector Evaluation measures

Most quick company checks stop at one number: is net profit positive. Sector Evaluation instead follows the same revenue through four successive cost layers — purchasing, operating expenses, financing, and total assets employed — and rates the profit left behind at each one.

Eight figures already sitting in a standard income statement and balance sheet — six entered directly, two derived automatically — produce:

1
Four efficiency ratiosProduct, Activity, Financing, Assets
2
A seven-band ratingExcellent through Loss, per ratio
3
A built-in consistency checkCatches figures that don't add up
4
A downloadable PDF reportReady to file or share
Exhibit 02 — Objective

Why run this test

The model exists to shorten the distance between "here are the year-end figures" and "here's where performance is strong and where it's under pressure."

  • Defining when fiscal and monetary policy should be used by officials.
  • Is there a waste of available resources within the sector?.
  • Is monetary policy negatively impacting the sector?.
  • Is the sector's efficiency significant? Is it struggling or attractive to investment?.
Exhibit 03 — Mechanism

Four layers, one reconciliation pass

The engine runs server-side (PHP) on every submission, following the same five-step sequence each time:

Reconcile

Confirm Total assets exceed Net profit. If the figures don't reconcile, the model stops and flags it.

Layer the profit

The same revenue is carried through four successive deductions — none, purchasing, purchasing + expenses, purchasing + expenses + interest — producing four distinct profit figures.

Rate each layer

For each layer, a turnover-adjusted revenue figure is divided by that layer's profit and placed on a seven-band scale running from Excellent to Loss.

Cross-reference

Each layer's rating is compared with the one before it, so a rating that slips (or holds, or improves) points at exactly which added cost caused the change.

Report

The four ratings, their cross-reference notes, and an overall verdict are assembled below and can be exported as a one-page PDF.

Engine note: the narrative wording for each layer is generated algorithmically from its rating band and its comparison with the previous layer — it is a modern reconstruction of the reporting logic, not a recovered copy of the original archived report files.

Exhibit 04 — Required data

Six figures from the financial statements

Only six numbers are entered by hand; gross profit and net profit are derived automatically.

1
Sales for the full yearTotal revenue for the period.
2
Purchases for the full yearCost of goods or materials purchased.
3
G&A expenses (incl. depreciation)Full-year operating expenses.
4
Debit interest for the full yearFinancing/interest expense — enter 0 if none.
5
Other revenues for the full yearNon-operating income — enter 0 if none.
6
Total fixed and current assetsBalance-sheet total assets at year end.
Exhibit 05 — Reading results

Seven bands, one direction

A low ratio means profit holds up well against what's committed — that's good. A high ratio means profit is thin relative to what's committed — that's poor. A negative profit at any layer is rated Loss regardless of the ratio's size.

BandProduct / Activity / Financing ratioAsset efficiency ratio
Excellent≤ 2.0≤ 2.0
Very good2.0 – 4.02.0 – 4.0
Good4.0 – 7.04.0 – 6.0
Average7.0 – 12.06.0 – 14.0
Poor12.0 – 50.0> 14.0
Very poor> 50.0
Lossprofit at that layer is negativeprofit at that layer is negative
Exhibit 06 — Applications

Where this gets used

Sector ministers to assess the efficiency of their respective sectors;
Central bank governor to assess the impact of monetary policy.
Investor quick screen
Accounting & finance coursework
Minister of finance to assess the impact of fiscal policy
Peer / sector benchmarking
Exhibit 07 — Advantages

What it's good for

  • Free and instant — no account, no file upload, no data retained.
  • Only six inputs; gross and net profit are calculated automatically.
  • Built-in reconciliation catches inconsistent figures before they mislead the reading.
  • Four-layer view instead of a single number, so the source of a weak result is traceable.
  • Produces a portable, one-page PDF report at the end.
Exhibit 08 — Limitations

What it doesn't do

  • Single-period snapshot — it does not show a trend across years.
  • The rating bands are generic thresholds.
  • Only as accurate as the figures entered — statement figures should already be finalized or audited.
  • Doesn't capture qualitative factors: management quality, market conditions, pending litigation.
  • Not a substitute for a professional audit or a formal credit assessment.
  • The narrative wording per layer is generated from rating bands, not a verbatim archived report.
Exhibit 09 — Calculator

Run your own evaluation

All six fields are required. This form now submits to the server (PHP), which reconciles the figures, computes the four ratios, and renders the report below .

Try the Tool Right Now

Enter the eight figures from your financial statements. The model will automatically check their consistency, then show your diagnostic report right below.

Clear Fields